Think and Grow Rich, published in 1937 by Napoleon Hill, is one of the best-selling self-help books of all time. Its authority rests on a famous origin story: that Hill was commissioned by steel magnate Andrew Carnegie to study the methods of the wealthy. But there's a serious problem with that story. There's little evidence the meeting that supposedly launched the book ever happened.

The famous origin story

As Hill told it, in 1908 he was a young magazine writer sent to interview Andrew Carnegie, one of the richest men in the world. The interview stretched over days, and at the end, Carnegie supposedly challenged Hill with a mission: spend the next twenty years interviewing the most successful people in America and distill what he learned into a formula anyone could follow. Hill accepted, and the eventual result was Think and Grow Rich.

This story is central to the book's authority. It positions the book not as one man's opinions, but as the distilled lessons of the wealthiest, gathered at the personal request of a legendary tycoon.

The problem

Researchers who've looked into it have found no solid evidence that the Carnegie meeting ever took place. Carnegie's own biographer, David Nasaw, who studied Carnegie's life in enormous detail, has said he found no evidence the two men ever met. And as far as investigators have been able to determine, Hill only began telling the Carnegie story after Carnegie had died, when the one person who could confirm or deny it was no longer around to do so.

In other words, the meeting that gives the book its authority may never have happened, and the story appears to have emerged when it couldn't be contradicted.

What this does and doesn't mean

To be careful about this: the absence of evidence for the meeting doesn't automatically make everything in the book wrong. Some of Hill's advice, about persistence, goal-setting, and belief, is sensible enough, and many readers have found value in it. A book can contain useful ideas regardless of how it was marketed.

But the specific claim that gives the book its credibility. That it distills the lessons of the richest man in America, gathered at his personal request, rests on a meeting nobody can show took place. The authority is built on an unverified, possibly invented, foundation.

Why it matters

For nearly ninety years, this story has been repeated in countless books, talks, and articles, and millions of people have believed it. Very few ever asked where it came from or whether it could be verified. That's the striking part: a foundational claim in one of history's best-selling success books went essentially unchecked for generations.

This is a powerful lesson in how compelling stories can carry unverified claims for decades. The story was too good to question, and so almost nobody did.

The honest limit

It's worth being precise: the lack of evidence for the Carnegie meeting isn't the same as proof it didn't happen. It's possible some meeting occurred and simply wasn't documented. And Hill's book has genuinely helped some readers, whatever its origins. The point isn't that Think and Grow Rich is worthless or that Hill definitely lied. It's that the claim underpinning the book's authority can't be verified, appears to have surfaced only after it couldn't be challenged, and was accepted for decades without scrutiny, a cautionary example of why even famous, beloved success stories deserve to be checked rather than taken on faith.

Sources

  • On Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich (1937): Carnegie biographer David Nasaw found no evidence Hill and Andrew Carnegie ever met; Hill first described the meeting after Carnegie's 1919 death.

The Selfmade Newsletter: one idea every Friday on what self-made people do differently. Free, on Substack. Join here.

This article is for education only and isn't financial advice. Returns are never guaranteed.